Sunday, May 27, 2012

UTET : विधानसभा में धरना देंगे टीईटी चयनित


UTET : विधानसभा में धरना देंगे टीईटी चयनित


Uttarakhand Teacher Eligibility Test News :
देहरादून: प्रदेश के टीईटी चयनित अभ्यर्थियों ने सोमवार को विधानसभा के समक्ष धरना देने की घोषणा की है। रविवार को हुई बैठक में टीईटी उत्तीर्ण बीएड प्रशिक्षित महासंघ के अध्यक्ष सुरेश ध्यानी ने कहा कि विशिष्ट बीटीसी के सभी लगभग 7500 रिक्त पद भरने की मांग सरकार से की जा रही है। यदि सरकार ने वर्तमान विशिष्ट बीटीसी में सीटें नहीं बढ़ाई तो टीईटी उत्तीर्ण उग्र आंदोलन को बाध्य होंगे। बैठक में पीएन सती, जयेंद्र सिंह, विक्रम नेगी, मनवीर परमार, मनोज डोभाल, अवधेश बिजल्वाण, देवेंद्र, हेमेंद्र कोटियाल आदि ने विचार रखे।

News : Jagran (28.512)

Saturday, May 26, 2012

UTET : टीईटी चयनितों ने शिक्षा निदेशालय में दिया धरना


UTET : टीईटी चयनितों ने शिक्षा निदेशालय में दिया धरना



Uttrakhand Teacher Eligibility Test News :

देहरादून: टीईटी चयनितों ने विशिष्ट बीटीसी प्रशिक्षण के लिए विज्ञप्ति जारी करने की मांग को लेकर शनिवार को शिक्षा निदेशालय में धरना दिया। प्राथमिक शिक्षा निदेशक अनिल कुमार नेगी के आश्वासन के बाद उन्होंने शाम को धरना समाप्त किया।
टीईटी चयनित शनिवार को शिक्षा निदेशालय ननूरखेड़ा पहुंचे और धरना दिया। इस दौरान टीईटी चयनित अनूप जदली ने कहा कि टीईटी चयनित लंबे समय से प्रशिक्षण की मांग कर रहे हैं, लेकिन विभागीय अधिकारी इस ओर ध्यान नहीं दे रहे हैं। इस कारण चयनितों को धरना देने के लिए बाध्य होना पड़ा। उन्होंने शिक्षकों के आठ हजार रिक्त पदों पर भर्ती प्रक्रिया जारी करने की भी मांग की। इसके बाद चयनितों ने प्राथमिक शिक्षा निदेशक अनिल कुमार नेगी से मुलाकात कर उनके समक्ष विशिष्ट बीटीसी के लिए विज्ञप्ति जारी करने की मांग रखी। इस पर श्री नेगी ने उन्हें अवगत कराया कि इस संबंध में सभी डाइट को आदेश जारी कर दिए गए है। धरना देने वालों में अनिल कोटनाला, जयप्रकाश ममगाई, महेश सकलानी, अंकित सजवाण, कुलदीप आदि उपस्थित थे

News : Jagran (26.5.12)

Friday, May 25, 2012

USET - डाकघर में नहीं पहुंचे यू-सेट के फार्म


USET - डाकघर में नहीं पहुंचे यू-सेट के फार्म
(Uttrakhand State Eligibility Test )

हरिद्वार। डाकघर में निर्धारित 25 तारीख तक यू-सेट (उत्तराखंड राज्य पात्रता परीक्षा) के फार्म नहीं पहुंच हैं। फार्म के लिए युवा दिन भर मुख्य डाकघर के चक्कर काटकर परेशान होते रहे।

कुमाऊं विश्वविद्यालय की ओर से उत्तराखंड राज्य पात्रता परीक्षा का आयोजन कराया जा रहा है। इसके आवेदन फार्म की कीमत 40 रुपये रखी गई थी। विश्वविद्यालय की ओर से निकाली विज्ञप्ति में शहरों के मुख्य डाकघरों में 25 मई से आवेदन मिलने की तिथि घोषित की गई थी। हरिद्वार के मुख्य डाकघर में शुक्रवार की शाम तक आवेदन फार्म नहीं आए। डिग्री कालेजों में प्रवक्ता बनने की हसरत रखने वाले युवक-युवतियां मुख्य डाकघर में आवेदन खरीदने पहुंचे, लेकिन फार्म नहीं होने की वजह से उन्हें खाली हाथ लौटना पड़ा। यू-सेट करने के इच्छुक परविंद्र कुमार, बबलू, महेश, रविंद्र और अनिल कुमार आदि ने बताया कि मुख्य डाकघर पर शुक्रवार को फार्म नहीं मिल सके।
कुमाऊं विश्वविद्यालय की ओर से उन्हें 25 मई को फार्म उपलब्ध कराए जाने से संबधित एक पत्र तो प्राप्त हुआ था। लेकिन, शुक्रवार तक यू-सेट के फार्म नहीं पहुंचे। जिससे पहले दिन भी आवेदन फार्म लेने वालाें को परेशानी का सामना करना पड़ा।

News : Amar  Ujala (26.5.12)

Saturday, May 19, 2012

Good News for All B. Ed Candidates, B. Ed candidates are eligible to apply after 1st Jan 2012. And No Time Limit


 Good News  -RTET : शिक्षक भर्ती में शामिल हो सकेंगे टेट के फर्स्ट लेवल में पास बीएड धारी


Good News for All B. Ed Candidates, B. Ed candidates are eligible to apply after 1st Jan 2012. And No Time Limit


Rajasthan High Court gave a decision - that due to only a date criteria, it is WRONG to say somebody is NOT eligible after that.


It can be a good news for Candidates of Uttrakhand , Uttar Pradesh and other states as well.

जोधपुर.आरटेट के फर्स्ट लेवल में पास बीएड डिग्रीधारक अब तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती परीक्षा में शामिल हो सकेंगे। राजस्थान हाईकोर्ट ने शनिवार को इस संबंध में आदेश जारी किए। न्यायाधीश गोपालकृष्ण व्यास ने कहा कि योग्यता के बावजूद केवल एक तारीख के बाद किसी योग्य व्यक्ति को अयोग्य घोषित करना उचित नहीं है। इस मामले में 17 मई को बहस पूरी हो गई थी, लेकिन कोर्ट ने फैसला सुरक्षित रख लिया था। बहस में कोर्ट ने एनसीटीई, राज्य सरकार तथा माध्यमिक शिक्षा बोर्ड की दलीलें खारिज कर दी थीं

मामले को लेकर वीराराम व अन्य ने याचिकाएं दायर की थीं। इन्होंने न्यायालय को बताया था कि शिक्षा का अधिकार अधिनियम 2009 तथा एनसीटीई के नियमों के अनुसार टेट के फस्र्ट लेवल में उत्तीर्ण बीएड डिग्रीधारी तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती परीक्षा- 2012 में कक्षा 1 से 5 तक अध्यापन कराने के योग्य हैं, जबकि राज्य सरकार ने 1 जनवरी 2012 तक ही इन अभ्यर्थियों को इस भर्ती परीक्षा के योग्य माना है। 

चूंकि, शिक्षक भर्ती परीक्षा के आवेदन इस साल फरवरी के अंत में मांगे गए थे, ऐसे में टेट के प्रथम स्तर में पास बीएड डिग्रीधारक अभ्यर्थी अयोग्य घोषित हो गए। राज्य सरकार की ओर से अतिरिक्त महाधिवक्ता जीआर पूनिया, एनसीटीई के अधिवक्ता कुलदीप माथुर व बोर्ड के अधिवक्ता राकेश अरोड़ा ने सरकार के आदेश को नियमों के तहत बताते हुए कोर्ट से
याचिकाएं खारिज करने को कहा था।

2010 में तय किए थे योग्यता के मानक :

3 अगस्त, 2010 को एनसीटीई ने नोटिफिकेशन जारी कर शिक्षा का अधिकार अधिनियम 2009 के सेक्शन 23 के सब सेक्शन 1 के तहत शिक्षकों के लिए योग्यता के मानक तय किए।

30 मार्च 2011 :

राजस्थान माध्यमिक शिक्षा बोर्ड ने आरटेट-2011 के आयोजन के लिए विज्ञापन के साथ ही गाइड लाइन जारी की।

>11.02.2011: आरटेट की शर्त संख्या 3 के तहत बीएड डिग्रीधारक अभ्यर्थियों को परीक्षा में शामिल करने की स्वीकृति।

>24.02.2012: राज्य सरकार ने प्रदेश की समस्त जिला परिषदों के माध्यम से तृतीय श्रेणी शिक्षक भर्ती परीक्षा आयोजित करने की विज्ञप्ति जारी की। इसमें उल्लेख था कि टेट प्रथम स्तर में उत्तीर्ण बीएड डिग्रीधारक इस भर्ती परीक्षा में शामिल नहीं हो सकते, जबकि टेट के द्वितीय स्तर में उत्तीर्ण अभ्यर्थी इसके लिए योग्य माने गए। ये नियम आरटेट के नियमों तथा उसके लिए जारी विज्ञप्ति में नहीं दर्शाए गए थे।

>06.03.2012: सैकड़ों अभ्यर्थियों ने नए नियम के ख्रिलाफ राज्य सरकार व बोर्ड को ज्ञापन दिए।

>मार्च 2012 में राजस्थान उच्च न्यायालय, जोधपुर व इसकी जयपुर पीठ में आरटेट के प्रथम लेवल में उत्तीर्ण बीएड डिग्रीधारियों ने याचिकाएं दायर कीं।

>17 मई 2012 : राज्य सरकार, माध्यमिक शिक्षा बोर्ड व एनसीटीई के अधिवक्ताओं की लंबी बहस के बाद कोर्ट ने निर्णय सुरक्षित रखा।

News : Bhaskar.com (20.5.12)

UTET : बीएड डिग्रीधारकों के लिए पैरवी


UTET : बीएड डिग्रीधारकों के लिए पैरवी


B.Ed Degree Holders are eligible upto 1st Jan. 2012 for Primary Teacher jobs as per NCTE guidelines reg. TET exam. Uttrakhand Government trying for relaxation as B. Ed degree holders pressure increases.

देहरादून, जागरण ब्यूरो: बीएड डिग्रीधारकों के लिए प्राइमरी शिक्षक बनने की बंद राह खुलवाने के लिए राज्य सरकार ने केंद्र में दस्तक दी है। इस बाबत एनसीटीई को पत्र भेजा गया है। उधर, हाईकोर्ट के आदेश के बाद शासन ने टीईटी अभ्यर्थियों की चयन प्रक्रिया शुरू करने के निर्देश दिए हैं


एनसीटीई की नई गाइड लाइन ने जनवरी, 2012 के बाद बीएड डिग्रीधारकों को बतौर प्राइमरी शिक्षक नियुक्ति नहीं दी जा सकती। इससे पहले टीचर एलिजिबिलिटी टेस्ट (टीईटी) में पास बीएड डिग्रीधारकों को प्राइमरी शिक्षक बनाने की अनुमति है। बीएड प्रशिक्षितों की ओर से दबाव बढ़ने पर राज्य ने एक बार फिर एनसीटीई से दरख्वास्त की। इसके लिए बाकायदा सरकार की ओर से एनसीटीई को पत्र भेजा गया है। दरअसल, प्राइमरी शिक्षकों के काफी संख्या में रिक्त पद और उस मुताबिक अभी तक एनसीटीई के निर्देशों के मुताबिक डिप्लोमा इन एलीमेंटरी एजुकेशन या बेचलर इन एलीमेंटरी एजुकेशन कोर्स शुरू नहीं हो पाया है। राज्य सरकार बीटीसी कोर्स का नया नामकरण भी कर चुकी है। नई व्यवस्था होने तक बीएड डिग्रीधारकों को प्राइमरी शिक्षकों के लिए पात्र माना जाए, यह पैरवी एनसीटीई से की गई है। उत्तराखंड ही नहीं, बल्कि उत्तरप्रदेश समेत अन्य प्रदेशों ने भी एनसीटीई में यह गुहार लगाई है। फिलहाल एनसीटीई ने इस बारे में निर्देश जारी नहीं किए हैं। राज्यों को इन निर्देशों का बेसब्री से इंतजार है


उधर, हाईकोर्ट के निर्देश के बाद टीईटी पास अभ्यर्थियों के प्राइमरी शिक्षक बनने में अड़चन दूर हो गई है। बीटीसी प्रशिक्षुओं की ओर से इस बारे में आपत्ति जताई गई थी। हाईकोर्ट में मामला होने से शिक्षा महकमे को टीईटी के जरिए प्राइमरी शिक्षकों का चयन रुक गया था। अब हाईकोर्ट का फैसला आने के बाद शासन ने महकमे को चयन प्रक्रिया शुरू करने के निर्देश दिए हैं। माना जा रहा है कि आगामी डेढ़ से दो माह में टीईटी मेरिट के आधार पर 2253 अभ्यर्थियों की नियुक्ति प्रक्रिया शुरू हो जाएगी। शिक्षा सचिव मनीषा पंवार ने हाईकोर्ट के आदेश के मद्देनजर टीईटी अभ्यर्थियों की चयन प्रक्रिया शुरू करने के निर्देश दिए हैं

News : Jagran (19.5.12)

Sunday, May 13, 2012

UTET / Uttrakhand TET : Naineetal Highcourt Disposed All 371 writ petitions


UTET / Uttrakhand TET : Naineetal Highcourt Disposed All 371 writ petitions

See Cases ( Information provided by Blog Visitor Mohd. Rashid )
For Authentic Details , Contact Highcourt of Uttrakhand/ Relevant Authority


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 1582 (SS) of 2011
Himanshu Upadhyay and others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Deepak Bisht, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1586 (SS) of 2011
Bharti Bisht and another …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Kishore Kumar, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1590 (SS) of 2011
Neeraj Kumar Pal & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Deep Chand Joshi, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1593 (SS) of 2011
Chandan Ram and others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Sandeep Tiwari, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
2
With
Writ Petition No. 1594 (SS) of 2011
Mukund Ballabh Pandey and others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Chetan Joshi, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1595 (SS) of 2011
Uma Pandey & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. D.S. Mehta, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1597 (SS) of 2011
Rajesh Pandey & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. D.K. Joshi, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1598 (SS) of 2011
Kripal Singh & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. H.S. Rawal, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
3
With
Writ Petition No. 1601 (SS) of 2011
Himanshu Kumar Bhaisora & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Deepak Bisht, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1602 (SS) of 2011
Vijay Kumar & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1603 (SS) of 2011
Murari Lal & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Jaivardhan Kandpal, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1604 (SS) of 2011
Suraj Singh Dasila & …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
4
With
Writ Petition No. 1606 (SS) of 2011
Manoj Kumar & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. D.K. Joshi, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1607 (SS) of 2011
Sanjay Kumar Sandoya & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Rakesh Kunwar, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1608 (SS) of 2011
Vikram Singh & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Ravindra Singh Bisht, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1609 (SS) of 2011
Smt. Meena Mahar …Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, Advocate present for the petitioner.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
5
With
Writ Petition No. 1610 (SS) of 2011
Arvind Kumar & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Raveendra Singh Bisht, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1612 (SS) of 2011
Mahipal Chand and another …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Bhuvnesh Joshi, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1615 (SS) of 2011
Suresh Chandra Singh & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Sandeep Tiwari, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1617 (SS) of 2011
Bishan Singh & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Rajesh Joshi, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
6
With
Writ Petition No. 1618 (SS) of 2011
Neelam & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Bhupendra Bisht, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1619 (SS) of 2011
Pushpa and another …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1621 (SS) of 2011
Suresh Chandra & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Joshi, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1623 (SS) of 2011
Rajeev Rawat & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Deepak Bisht, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
7
With
Writ Petition No. 1627 (SS) of 2011
Sompal Singh Bavaria & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Anil Dabral, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1628 (SS) of 2011
Jaywant Singh & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Rakesh Kunwar, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1629 (SS) of 2011
Harish Kumar and & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Deepa Arya, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1630 (SS) of 2011
Mukesh Chandra Upadhyay & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Navnish Negi, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
8
With
Writ Petition No. 1631 (SS) of 2011
Rajiv Rawat & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1632 (SS) of 2011
Chandra Shekhar & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Raveendra Singh Bisht, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1633 (SS) of 2011
Pranil Kumar Joshi & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Joshi, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1637 (SS) of 2011
Bishan Ram & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Puran Singh Bisht, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
9
With
Writ Petition No. 1639 (SS) of 2011
Bhupendra Mohan Pant & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Yogesh Pacholia, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1642 (SS) of 2011
Manoj Pant & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Chetan Joshi, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1643 (SS) of 2011
Jagdamba Khanduri & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. T.P.S. Takuli, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1646 (SS) of 2011
Dalveer Kaur …Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate present for the petitioner.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
10
With
Writ Petition No. 1647 (SS) of 2011
Ravi Kumar …Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Raveendra Singh Bisht, Advocate present for the petitioner.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1648 (SS) of 2011
Vinod Khulbe & another …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Swapnil Bisht, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1651 (SS) of 2011
Neeraj Kumar & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1652 (SS) of 2011
Rajendra Kumar & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. T.P.S. Takuli, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
11
With
Writ Petition No. 1655 (SS) of 2011
Ragini Joshi …Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. P.C. Petshali, Advocate present for the petitioner.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1656 (SS) of 2011
Om Prakash & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Rakesh Kunwar, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1658 (SS) of 2011
Rajesh Chandra & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Shivanand Bhatt, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1659 (SS) of 2011
Rakesh Kumar & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. P.C. Petshali, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
12
With
Writ Petition No. 1661 (SS) of 2011
Pradeep Chandra Pandey & others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1662 (SS) of 2011
Pushpa Kumar & another …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Raveendra Singh Bisht, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1664 (SS) of 2011
Gaurav Kumar …Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Manish Arora, Advocate present for the petitioner.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1667 (SS) of 2011
Sundar Singh …Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Joshi, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
13
With
Writ Petition No. 1669 (SS) of 2011
Kailash Chandra Gwasikoti & another …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Bhagwat Mehra, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1670 (SS) of 2011
Sanjay Kumar …Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Narain Dutt, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1671 (SS) of 2011
Usha Rani …Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Narain Dutt, Advocate present for the petitioner.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1672 (SS) of 2011
Sikha Gupta and another …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. H.S. Rawal, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
14
With
Writ Petition No. 1673 (SS) of 2011
Bitina Kumar and others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Navnish Negi, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1675 (SS) of 2011
Rajeev Kandpal …Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Amish Tiwari, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1676 (SS) of 2011
Manish Bagdwal and others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Deepak Bisht, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
With
Writ Petition No. 1679 (SS) of 2011
Rajesh Nautiyal and others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Jayvardhan Kandpal, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
15
And
Writ Petition No. 1680 (SS) of 2011
Berendra Singh Chauhan and others …Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others …Respondents
Mr. Deepak Bisht, Advocate present for the petitioners.
Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder present for the State of Uttarakhand.
Ms. Seema Sah, with Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad.
Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate for National Council for Teacher Education.
Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral)
1. Heard Mr. Deepak Bisht, Advocate for the petitioners, Mr. Anil Bisht, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand, and Ms. Seema Sah, Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, respectively for “Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad” as well as Mr. T.A. Khan, Advocate present for National Council for Teacher Education.
2. In all these connected writ petitions a common question is involved and the respective counsels appearing for the “Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad”, namely, Ms. Seema Sah, Ms. Geeta Parihar, and Mr. Asif Ali, Advocates, which is the necessary party in the present writ petitions fairly submit that the writ petitions be disposed of at the admission stage itself for the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case.
3. Although all the writ petitions are being disposed of by the present orders, the facts of the case which has been mentioned are of Writ Petition No. 1582 (SS) of 2011, only for the sake of convenience.
4. All the petitioners before this Court are the candidates for an examination known as Teachers Eligibility Test (hereafter referred to as “TET”). This examination was conducted under the directions of a Central Body known as National Council for Teacher Education (hereinafter referred to as “NCTE”) by which the State Government was to conduct such an examination, which is known as Uttarakhand Teachers Eligibility Test (hereinafter referred to as “UTET”). A candidate who is desirous to become a teacher in an elementary school must qualify with at least 60% of marks (for General Category candidates), and for the reserved category candidates they must qualify this examination with a minimum 50% marks. This would be one of the eligibilities for a teacher in elementary schools, in the State of Uttarakhand. This has been done after the Right to Education being incorporated in Constitution of India under Article 21-A vide Constitution (Eighty Sixth Amendment Act) and consequently, the Parliament enacting an Act known as “Right to Education Act, 2009” whereby, inter alia, it has been stipulated that it is the Right of a child not only to get an elementary education but a “meaningful elementary education.” Pursuant to the direction of NCTE the State of Uttarakhand invited the applications from eligible candidates to appear in “TET” examination. One of the conditions imposed by the State Government in the examination (under the direction of NCTE) is that a candidate who possesses B.Ed. qualification will only be eligible to appear in the present examination, if he has at least 50% in graduation, for general category candidates and 45% for reserved category candidates.
5. Thereafter, a large number of writ petitions were filed before this Court challenging both the authority of the NCTE as well as the State Government to conduct such an examination (i.e. TET), and more particularly the imposition of a condition of having a minimum percentage of marks in graduation a candidate having
B.Ed. qualification. These writ petitions were filed by the petitioners in which leading case was Writ Petition No. 772 (SS) of 2011 (Baldev Singh and others Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others) was decided by an order dated 20.8.2011, holding the validity of TET and rejecting the claim of the petitioners regarding holding of such examination. At the same time, this Court also held that fixing the minimum percentage of marks in graduation for this examination has actually no nexus with the object sought to be achieved and therefore, the writ petitions were disposed of with certain directions. It was held that such a restriction (of having minimum percentage in graduation) is both unreasonable, unjust and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, this Court declared such a condition of asking a minimum percentage of marks in graduation from candidates having B.Ed. qualification was violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Further this Court directed the respondent to permit the petitioners to appear in TET, Examination treating them to be qualified.
6. At this juncture, it is necessary to state that Board, NCTE and consequently, the State Government had also during the pendency of the above writ petitions had reduced the percentage of marks from 50% to 45% for general category candidates and from 45% to 40% for the reserved category candidates.
7. This Court has also been informed that State Government as well as NCTE has not filed any special appeal against this judgment before this Court nor any petition before the Hon’ble Apex Court. Therefore, the above referred judgment has attained a finality. As such, candidates are held to be eligible to appear in the examination and there is no reason to withhold the result of such candidates merely because the petitioners were not party in the above writ petitions. This Court has been informed that such candidates who have appeared in the examination are either being treated to be disqualified or their results have been withheld who have less than minimum prescribed percentage in their graduation. It has further been submitted before this Court that all these candidates are being compelled to obtain orders from this Court, hence these writ petitions.
8. In view of this, this inaction on the part of the respondents is highly unreasonable and has caused undue hardship to the petitioners. The judgment of this Court passed in Writ Petition No. 772 (SS) of 2011 was a judgment of the candidates having judgment in rem and not a judgment in persona.
9. Counsel appearing for the Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksha Parishad has filed a letter dated 23.11.2011, which is taken on record, which has been received through Secretary, “Uttarakhand Vidyalayi Shiksah Parishad” in which the respondents state that to a certain extent the Board has accepted its mistake and clarified its position now and on a mere representation by the petitioners the result of such candidates (like the present petitioners) is liable to be declared. However, there should be no such need for any such formality being asked from the petitioners, in case the petitioners had a recognized B.Ed. qualification, they shall be treated to be qualified irrespective of the marks they had obtained in their graduation provided they are graduates from a duly recognized University. Nothing, further needs to be stated by this Court.
10. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petitions are allowed.
11. No order as to costs.
12. Certified copy of this order be issued today itself.
(Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.)
Dated: 25.11.2011


Source :
From: rashid azad <rashid.khurshid@gmail.com>
Date: 2012/5/13
Subject: HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND- NAINITAL
To: rajesh rao <rajeshrow86@gmail.com>, nnitinmehta1982@rediffmail.com, dev02019654@gmail.com, Muskan Bharat <muskan24by7@gmail.com>,
**********************
One more information file sent by Mr. Rashid is  :


WPSS No. 1888 of 2011
With
CLMA No. 41 of 2012
CLMA No. 163 of 2012
CLMA No. 167 of 2012
Hon’ble Tarun Agarwala, J.
Mr. Sandeep Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. H.M. Raturi, Standing Counsel for the State.
Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Paresh Tripathi, Advocate for the intervener.
The petitioners will file counter affidavit to the impleadment applications as well as intervention application within a week.
The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents is allowed a week’s time to file the counter affidavit.
The learned counsel appearing for N.C.T.E. is also allowed a week’s time to file the counter affidavit.
This order will apply in all the connected writ petitions and separate order need not be passed.
List immediately after the expiry of the aforesaid period.
Interim order, if any, will continue till the next date of listing.
(Tarun Agarwala, J.)
Dated 22.02.2012
Shiv

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

UTET : टीईटी पास अभ्यर्थियों की नियुक्ति का रास्ता साफ


UTET : टीईटी पास अभ्यर्थियों की नियुक्ति का रास्ता साफ
Uttrakhand TET News
नैनीताल-हाई कोर्ट ने शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा (टीईटी) में सफल अभ्यर्थियों को प्रशिक्षु शिक्षक के रूप में नियुक्ति देने संबंधी प्रावधान को चुनौती देने वाली याचिका खारिज कर दी है। इससे 2253 पदों पर टीईटी पास अभ्यर्थियों की नियुक्ति का रास्ता साफ हो गया है। कोर्ट ने नियुक्ति प्रक्रिया जारी रखने के निर्देश दिए हैं।  बीटीसी प्रशिक्षु अनिल पांडे व अन्य ने हाई कोर्ट में याचिका दाखिल कर कहा था कि वे शिक्षक बनने का प्रशिक्षण ले रहे हैं, नियमानुसार उन्हें नियुक्ति का अधिकार हासिल है। उनका कहना था कि सरकार ने 15 दिसंबर 2011 को जारी विज्ञप्ति में 2253 पदों पर टीईटी पास अभ्यर्थियों को प्रशिक्षु शिक्षक के रूप में नियुक्ति के आदेश दिया था, जो नियम विरुद्ध होने के साथ ही निरस्त करने योग्य है। सरकार की ओर से कोर्ट में दायर दाखिल हलफनामे में जानकारी दी गई कि विज्ञप्ति में 1147 पदों को बीटीसी प्रशिक्षुओं के लिए आरक्षित किया गया है। विज्ञप्ति कुल पदों की संख्या एवं उपलब्ध प्रशिक्षुओं के आधार पर जारी की गई। सरकार की ओर से याचिका को खारिज करने की मांग की गई। वरिष्ठ न्यायाधीश न्यायमूर्ति तरुण अग्रवाल ने सरकार के तथ्यों से सहमत होते हुए बीटीसी प्रशिक्षुओं की याचिका खारिज करते हुए टीईटी पास अभ्यर्थियों की चयन प्रक्रिया पर लगी रोक भी हटा दी। कोर्ट ने इस मामले में दायर अन्य याचिकाओं को भी खारिज कर दिया है


Tuesday, May 8, 2012

UTET : टीईटी के खिलाफ याचिकाएं खारिज



प्रशिक्षु अध्यापकों की भर्ती का रास्ता खुला , 
UTET : टीईटी के खिलाफ याचिकाएं खारिज

Uttrakhand TET News :

अमर उजाला ब्यूरो
देहरादून। शिक्षक पात्रता परीक्षा (टीईटी) पास कर चुके बीएड उपाधिधारकों के प्रशिक्षु शिक्षक बनने का रास्ता खुल गया है। नैनीताल हाईकोर्ट ने टीईटी परीक्षा और ट्रेनी शिक्षकों की भर्ती को चुनौती देने वाली सभी 371 याचिकाएं खारिज कर दी
जस्टिस तरुण अग्रवाल की अदालत में चल रहे इस प्रकरण में विद्यालयी शिक्षा विभाग के पक्ष को वाजिब माना गया। पिछले दिसंबर में इस भर्ती प्रक्रिया को अदालत ने स्टे कर दिया था। नियमित बीटीसी कर रहे प्रशिक्षुओं ने नियुक्ति प्रक्रिया को चुनौती दी थी। उनका कहना था कि जिन पदों के लिए उन्हें प्रशिक्षण दिया जा रहा है, उन्हीं पदों को विद्यालयी शिक्षा विभाग टीईटी के जरिए भर रही है। वहीं कुछ याचिकाएं टीईटी में पूछे गए प्रश्नों को लेकर थीं। कुल 371 रिटें थी।
विद्यालयी शिक्षा निदेशालय की ओर अदालत को बताया गया कि महकमे में शिक्षकों के कुल 4805 पद रिक्त हैं। जिसमें से करीब 1200 पद नियमित बीटीसी प्रशिक्षुओं के लिए आरक्षित रखा गया है। शेष पदों में से 700 पदों पर शिक्षा आचार्य और 868 पत्राचार बीटीसी प्रशिक्षुओं की भर्ती होनी है। इसके अलावा जितने पद बचते हैं उन पर बीएड उपाधिधारकों को टीईटी के माध्यम से नियुक्त करने की प्रक्रिया शुरू की गई है। इस नियुक्ति प्रक्रिया में नियमित बीटीसी कर रहे प्रशिक्षुओं का हित कहीं भी प्रभावित नहीं हो रहा है। महकमा नए सिरे से प्रशिक्षु शिक्षकों की भर्ती की प्रक्रिया अब जल्द शुरू कर देगा।

यह होगी भर्ती व्यवस्था
टीईटी उत्तीर्ण कर चुके बीएड उपाधिधारकों को डायट वार और वर्षवार अपने-अपने जिले में चयनित किया जाएगा। चयन के बाद उन्हें छह महीने का विशेष प्रशिक्षण दिलाया जाएगा। प्रशिक्षण पास करने वाले अभ्यर्थियों को उस समय की प्रचलित नियमावली के अनुसार नियुक्ति दी जाएगी।


News : Amar Ujala (9.5.12)